Pennsylvania: A request for more Algenny Wilderness
Stephen Robar, a political science professor at the University of
Pittsburgh at Bradford, enjoys hiking and snowshoeing in the Allegheny
National Forest. The six-page letter signed by Dr. Robar and a host of
botanists, biologists, herpetologists, ecologists and economists
supports the wilderness designation proposal of the Friends of
Allegheny Wilderness, a group formed eight years ago to advocate for
more wilderness in the state’s only national forest, 100 miles
northeast of Pittsburgh.

Wilderness designation, according to the
letter, would help improve ecological diversity and health on the
entire Allegheny Plateau, protect endangered species and preserve
forest landscapes threatened by timbering, expanding oil and gas
drilling and road building. The 513,000-acre forest has just two
wilderness areas totaling 8,979 acres, or less than 2 percent. On
average, 18 percent of all national forest land in the U.S. is
designated wilderness and protected from road building and development
in the National Wilderness Preservation System. That system includes a
total of 107 million acres, but very little — two-tenths of 1 percent
— is located in the Northeast.
The proposal by Friends of Allegheny
Wilderness would increase the amount of wilderness designated in the
Allegheny to 63,619 acres, about 12 percent of the forest and in line
with other national forests in the eastern part of the nation. “This
bold statement from the scientific community underscores the need to
bring real balance to the multiple uses of the Allegheny National
Forest,” said Kirk Johnson, executive director of the Friends of
Allegheny Wilderness.
“We know that there will always be logging,
motorized recreation and oil development here, but the continuing
integrity of our remaining wild areas is very much in jeopardy and
requires the swift action of the Congress to alleviate the threat.”
The letter and a new 15-minute video produced by the group and
highlighting the forest’s proposed wilderness areas were sent to the
state’s congressional delegation and are part of a reinvigorated
effort to gain congressional support for wilderness expansion in the
forest. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09026/944561-85.stm
To keep this blog going it has to keep growing! Please often click
below to: email, repost, share this…


A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT would look excellent on that ridge!
Pretty scenery, nice wilderness hiking trails, clean lakes, lots of fishies leaping to and fro, and protected expansive preserves are all wonderful necessities worthy of public individual energy. But the fanatical Left-Liberal lunatic Greenie’ fringe, so ignorantly fearful of technology and production, will have us all living under bridges as the coming Ice Age hits. You’re doing the work of the enemies of mankind, not the work of God!
But hey, far be it from me to point out to you people with all your goddamn degrees that: the Wilderness Society, Friends of the Earth, Canoe Federation, Sierra Club are funded with two fistfuls of greenbacks, these the Malthusian, Elitist, wine & cheese swilling, vastly Financier-funded organizations. It’s pure hatred of the Middle and Working Classes. Forty years of Green BS has succeeded in spawning a vast generation of fanatical radical “Environmentalists”. If you people did one SCINTILLA as much to re-build the factories of the USA as you do for the spotted horned toad and the Gallapagoan Gadfly and the Vampire Bat (Sierra Club poster child) we might have a country again!
It’s time you people saw that the beauty of a Nuclear Reactor is ever as wondrous as any Albert Bierstadt, and took your “Working Class” heads out of your green assholes.
Beautiful and useful! Well done!
.-= Huiles essentielles´s last blog ..Aromathérapie =-.
I?m tempted to say ?what a load of crap!? just for the sake of irony, but I?ll refrain